Andreev Bound States at the Interface of Antiferromagnets and d-wave Superconductors
Brian M. Andersen, P. Hedegaard
arXiv:cond-mat/0206422 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.66.104515 · 2002-06-22 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We set up a simple transfer matrix formalism to study the existence of bound states at interfaces and in junctions between antiferromagnets and d-wave superconductors. The well-studied zero energy mode at the {110} interface between an insulator and a d-wave superconductor is spin split when the insulator is an antiferromagnet. This has as a consequence that any competing interface induced superconducting order parameter that breaks the time reversal symmetry needs to exceed a critical value before a charge current is induced along the interface.
Similar papers
Andreev bound states at the interface of antiferromagnets and d-wave superconductors
similarity 0.91Brian Møller Andersen & Per Hedegård
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Proximity effect, quasiparticle transport, and local magnetic moment in ferromagnet-d-wave superconductor junctions
similarity 0.89Jian-Xin Zhu & C. S. Ting · 1999 · arXiv:cond-mat/9910276
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Andreev spectroscopy of nonhelical spin textures in topological insulators
similarity 0.89David J. Alspaugh et al. · 2021 · arXiv:2108.07332
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconducting Junctions with Ferromagnetic, Antiferromagnetic or Charge-Density-Wave Interlayers
similarity 0.89Yuri Barash et al. · 2005 · arXiv:cond-mat/0512204
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Bound states at the interface between antiferromagnets and superconductors
similarity 0.89B. M. Andersen et al. · 2005 · arXiv:cond-mat/0508214
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Frustrated edge currents in bilayers formed of s- and d-wave superconductors
similarity 0.89Vedangi Pathak et al. · 2025 · arXiv:2506.21482
Source status unknown — claims are unverified