Gaussian fluctuation corrections to the BCS mean field gap amplitude at zero temperature
S. Kos, A. J. Millis, A. I. Larkin
arXiv:cond-mat/0207190 · DOI 10.1103/PHYSREVB.70.214531 · 2002-07-07 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
The leading (Gaussian) fluctuation correction to the weak coupling zero temperature BCS superconducting gap equation is computed. We find that the dominant contribution comes from the high energies and momenta (compared to the gap) and gives a correction smaller by the weak-coupling factor $gN_0$ than the mean-field terms. This correction is small due to cancellation of singular contributions from the amplitude and phase mode at high energies and momenta.
Similar papers
Universality in low-dimensional BCS theory
similarity 0.91Joscha Henheik et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2301.05621
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Restoring gauge invariance in conventional fluctuation corrections to a superconductor
similarity 0.91Rufus Boyack · 2018 · arXiv:1806.02438
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Short-distance breakdown of the Higgs mechanism and the robustness of the BCS theory for charged superconductors
similarity 0.90Sonja Fischer et al. · 2017 · arXiv:1711.11382
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
The BCS Energy Gap at High Density
similarity 0.90Joscha Henheik & Asbjørn Bækgaard Lauritsen · 2021 · arXiv:2106.02028
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Understanding Novel Superconductors with Ab Initio Calculations
similarity 0.90Lilia Boeri · 2019 · arXiv:1903.05708
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
A Boson-Fermion theory that goes beyond the BCS approximations for superconductors
similarity 0.90I. Chávez et al. · 2022 · arXiv:2206.05342
Source status unknown — claims are unverified