Random matrix theory of proximity effect in disordered wires
M. Titov, H. Schomerus
arXiv:cond-mat/0208107 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.67.024410 · 2002-08-06 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We study analytically the local density of states in a disordered normal-metal wire at ballistic distance to a superconductor. Our calculation is based on a scattering-matrix approach, which concerns for wave-function localisation in the normal metal, and extends beyond the conventional semiclassical theory based on Usadel and Eilenberger equations. We also analyse how a finite transparency of the NS interface modifies the spectral proximity effect and demonstrate that our results agree in the dirty diffusive limit with those obtained from the Usadel equation.
Similar papers
Proximity Effect and Multiple Andreev Reflections in Diffusive SNS Junctions
similarity 0.91J. C. Cuevas et al. · 2005 · arXiv:cond-mat/0507247
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
An introduction to the quasiclassical theory of superconductivity for diffusive proximity-coupled systems
similarity 0.91Venkat Chandrasekhar · 2003 · arXiv:cond-mat/0312507
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconductive properties of thin dirty SN bilayers
similarity 0.89Ya. V. Fominov & M. V. Feigel'man · 2000 · arXiv:cond-mat/0008038
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Josephson effect in strongly disordered metallic wires
similarity 0.89Mustafa E. Ismagambetov et al. · 2025 · arXiv:2503.15623
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Quantum decay of the supercurrent and intrinsic capacitance of Josephson junctions beyond the tunnel limit
similarity 0.89D. S. Antonenko & M. A. Skvortsov · 2015 · arXiv:1509.03290
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Modeling Tunneling for the Unconventional Superconducting Proximity Effect
similarity 0.89Parisa Zareapour et al. · 2016 · arXiv:1611.01520
Source status unknown — claims are unverified