Carbon nanotubes: Ballistic transport or room-temperature superconductivity?
Guo-meng Zhao
arXiv:cond-mat/0208201 · 2002-08-09 · arXiv: Superconductivity
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We theoretically estimate the electron-phonon coupling constant lambda for metallic single-walled carbon nanotubes with a diameter of 1.4 nm. The partial electron-phonon coupling constant for the hardest phonon mode is estimated to be about 0.0036, in good agreement with that deduced from Raman scattering data assuming superconductivity above room temperature. Assuming no superconductivity, we estimate the room-temperature inelastic mean free path l_ep due to electron-phonon scattering to be about 0.46 micrometer, and the total room-temperature inelastic mean free path l_in to be about 0.16 micrometer. We then argue that the electrical transport data of individual multi-walled nanotubes cannot be explained by ballistic transport at room temperature but provide strong evidence for quasi-one-dimensional superconductivity above room temperature.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| C60 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| RBa2Cu3O7-y Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 90 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| PbIn Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| MoGe Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Lattice dynamics and electron-phonon interaction in (3,3) carbon nanotubes
similarity 0.89K. -P. Bohnen et al. · 2004 · arXiv:cond-mat/0411515
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Static conductivity and superconductivity of carbon nanotubes: Relations between tubes and sheets
similarity 0.89Lorin X. Benedict et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Quasi-one-dimensional superconductivity above 300 K and quantum phase slips in individual carbon nanotubes
similarity 0.89Guo-meng Zhao · 2002 · arXiv:cond-mat/0208198
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Is Room Temperature Superconductivity in Carbon Nanotubes Too Wonderful to Believe?
similarity 0.88Guo-meng Zhao · 2003 · arXiv:cond-mat/0307770
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Possible superconductivity above 400 K in carbon-based multiwall nanotubes
similarity 0.87G. M. Zhao & Y. S. Wang · 2001 · arXiv:cond-mat/0111268
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Theory of superconductivity of carbon nanotubes and graphene
similarity 0.87K. Sasaki et al. · 2006 · arXiv:cond-mat/0611452
Source status unknown — claims are unverified