Magnetosuperconductivity in ruthenocuprates RuSr2GdCu2O8(Ru 1212) and RuSr2(Gd0.75Ce0.25)2Cu2O10 (Ru 1222) a critical review
V. P. S. Awana, M. Karppinen, H. Yamauchi
arXiv:cond-mat/0210037 · 2002-10-02
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We reviewed our various results on rutheno-cuprate magneto-superconductors RuSr2GdCu2O8(Ru-1212) and RuSr2(Gd0.75Ce0.25)2Cu2O10(Ru-1222). It is observed, that it is difficult to control the oxygen content of Ru-1212, though the same is possible up to some extent for Ru-1222. Samples of both phases exhibited superconductivity, presumably in the CuO2 plane at low temperatures coexisting with magnetic ordering of Ru spins of predominantly antiferromagnetic type below 140 K having a ferromagnetic component appearing below 20 K. Electrical conductivity measurements indicate that the RuO2 layer takes part in conduction besides the CuO2 plane. The magnetic ordering temperature of Ru spins is seen as a clear hump in the resistivity measurements, establishing the magnetic spins interaction with the conduction carriers. Though the bulk physical property measurements exhibited the magneto-superconductivity, SAED results question the same to co-existence of the two at microscopic level. Our results indicate towards the fact that solid solutions of (Ru1-xCux)-1212, which can be superconducting with x > 0.5, but not magnetic may be precipitating with the stoichiometric magnetic Ru-1212 phase. Also highlighted in the review are various existing contradictions in the literature regarding physical properties of these systems. One such example is the results for Cp that are used as the evidence of bulk superconductivity in Ru-1212. We believe the establishment of superconductivity along with low-T ferromagnetic ordering of Ru spins in intrinsically phase-pure rutheno-cuprates is yet far from conclusive.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| RuSr2GdCu2O8 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| RuSr2(Gd0.75Ce0.25)2Cu2O10 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Magneto-Superconductivity of Rutheno-Cuprates
similarity 0.97V. P. S. AWANA · 2004 · arXiv:cond-mat/0407799
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Hysteresis and stepwise structure in MR curves of granular superconducting ruthenocuprates RuSr(GdCeCuO}
similarity 0.93B. I. Belevtsev et al. · 2012 · arXiv:1205.6743
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Direct Observation of Coexistence of Ferromagnetism and Superconductivity in RuSr2(Gd0.7Ce0.3)2Cu2O10
similarity 0.93S. Y. Chen et al. · 2001 · arXiv:cond-mat/0105510
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Pressure dependence of superconducting and magnetic critical temperatures in the ruthenocuprates
similarity 0.92R. Citro et al. · 2005 · arXiv:cond-mat/0503119
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Absence of a Bulk Meissner State in RuSr2GdCu2O8
similarity 0.92C. W. Chu et al. · 1999 · arXiv:cond-mat/9910056
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Towards universal magnetization curves in the superconducting state of RuSr2GdCu2O8
similarity 0.92Thomas P. Papageorgiou et al. · 2003 · arXiv:cond-mat/0304263
Source status unknown — claims are unverified