What do the phase-sensitive experiments tell us?
Yunping Wang, Li Lu, Dianlin Zhang
arXiv:cond-mat/0210285 · 2002-10-13 · arXiv: Superconductivity
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
The phase-sensitive experiments on cuprate superconductors have told us about the symmetry of the condensate wavefunction. However, they can not determine the pairing symmetry of Cooper pairs. To describe a superconducting state, two wavefunctions are needed, condensate wavefunction and pairing wavefunction. The former describes the entirety movement of the pairs and the latter describes the relative movement of the two electrons within a pair. The $π$-phase shift observed in the phase sensitive Josephson measurements can not prove that the pairing state is d-wave. We present here a new explanation and predict some new observable phenomena.
Similar papers
Superconducting Phase Transistor in Diffusive Four-terminal Ferromagnetic Josephson Junctions
similarity 0.87Mohammad Alidoust et al. · 2012 · arXiv:1204.2548
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Designing Phase Sensitive Probes of Monopole Superconducting Order
similarity 0.87Grayson R. Frazier et al. · 2024 · arXiv:2407.18701
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Quantized resonant tunneling effect in Josephson junctions with ferromagnetic bilayers
similarity 0.86Hao Meng et al. · 2025 · arXiv:2504.20366
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
d-Wave Superconductivity Induced by Chern-Simons Term in High- Cuprates
similarity 0.86Takao Morinari · 2000 · arXiv:cond-mat/0010199
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Strong-coupling Superconductivity in the Cuprate Oxide
similarity 0.86Fusayoshi J. Ohkawa · 2009 · arXiv:0905.2712
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
SU(4) Model of High-Temperature Superconductivity: Manifestation of Dynamical Symmetry in Cuprates
similarity 0.86Yang Sun et al. · 2005 · arXiv:cond-mat/0502074
Source status unknown — claims are unverified