← Back to search

Magnetic fluctuations and resonant peak in cuprates: a microscopic theory

I. Sega, P. Prelovsek, J. Bonca

arXiv:cond-mat/0211090 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.68.054524 · 2002-11-05 · Physical Review B

T2theoretical56 citations

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

The theory for the dynamical spin susceptibility within the t-J model is developed, as relevant for the resonant magnetic peak and normal-state magnetic response in superconducting (SC) cuprates. The analysis is based on the equations of motion for spins and the memory-function presentation of magnetic response where the main damping of the low-energy spin collective mode comes from the decay into fermionic degrees of freedom. It is shown that the damping function at low doping is closely related to the c-axis optical conductivity. The analysis reproduces doping-dependent features of the resonant magnetic scattering.

Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval

FormulaReported Tc (K)Pressure (GPa)Type
YBa2Cu3O7

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

—Pressure not reportedunknown
YBa2Cu3O6+x

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

—Pressure not reportedunknown
Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

—Pressure not reportedunknown
Tl2Ba2CuO6

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

—Pressure not reportedunknown
La2-xSrxCuO4

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

—Pressure not reportedunknown

Similar papers