On the effect of heterovalent substitutions in ruthenocuprates
P. W. Klamut, B. Dabrowski, S. M. Mini, M. Maxwell, J. Mais, I. Felner, U. Asaf, F. Ritter, A. Shengelaya, R. Khasanov, I. M. Savic, H. Keller, A. Wisniewski, R. Puzniak, I. M. Fita, C. Sulkowski, M. Matusiak
arXiv:cond-mat/0212018 · DOI 10.1016/S0921-4534(03)00637-3 · 2002-12-02 · Physica C-superconductivity and Its Applications
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We discuss the properties of superconducting derivatives of the RuSr2GdCu2O8 (1212-type) ruthenocuprate, for which heterovalent doping has been achieved through partial substitution of Cu ions into the RuO2 planes (Ru1-xSr2GdCu2+xO8-d, 0<x<0.75, Tcmax=72 K for x=0.3-0.4) and Ce ions into the Gd sites (RuSr2Gd1-yCeyCu2O8, 0<y<0.1). The measurements of XANES, thermopower, and magnetization under external pressure reveal an underdoped character of all compounds. Muon spin rotation experiments indicate the presence of magnetic order at low temperatures (Tm=14-2 K for x=0.1-0.4). Properties of these two series lead us to the qualitative phase diagram for differently doped 1212-type ruthenocuprates. The difference in temperature of magnetic ordering found for superconducting and non-superconducting RuSr2GdCu2O8 is discussed in the context of the properties of substituted compounds. The high pressure oxygen conditions required for synthesis of Ru1-xSr2RECu2+xO8-d, have been extended to synthesis of a Ru1-xSr2Eu2-yCeyCu2+xO10-d series. The Cu->Ru doping achieved in these phases is found to decrease the temperature for magnetic ordering as well the volume fraction of the magnetic phase.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ru1-xSr2GdCu2+xO8-d Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 72 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Magnetization, Structural and Nuclear Quadrupole Resonance Study of RuSr2EuCeCu2O10+d
similarity 0.92G. V. M. Williams et al. · 2001 · arXiv:cond-mat/0108521
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Effect of Mn substitution on the delicate balance between structure and properties of Gd1.4Ce0.6Sr2RuCu2O10
similarity 0.91S. Kalavathi et al. · 2005 · arXiv:cond-mat/0509633
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Crystal structures, magnetic and superconducting properties of the RuSr_2NdCu_2O_x and RuSr_2GdCu_2O_y compounds
similarity 0.90A. Vecchione et al. · 2001 · arXiv:cond-mat/0110482
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Tuning of the superconducting and ferromagnetic transitions by Cu doping for Ru in GdSr2RuCu2O8
similarity 0.90J. Janaki et al. · 2003 · arXiv:cond-mat/0303287
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Magnetic, electrical and structural properties of the new Re-doped ruthenocuprate Ru1-xRexSr2GdCu2Oy
similarity 0.89L. T. Corredor et al. · 2014 · arXiv:1409.0152
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Charge and spin states of Ru and Cu in magnetic superconductor RuSr2GdCu2O8 studied by NMR
similarity 0.89Ken-ichi Kumagai et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified