Nominal doping and partition of doped holes between planar and apical orbitals in La2-xSrxCuO4
E. S. Bozin, S. J. L. Billinge
arXiv:cond-mat/0302062 · 2003-02-04 · arXiv: Superconductivity
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
By considering both the average structural parameters obtained from Rietveld refinement of neutron powder diffraction data, and the local structural parameters obtained from the atomic pair distribution function, we have tested the recent hypothesis of Perry et al [Perry et al., Phys. Rev. B v.65, 144501 (2002)] that doping in La2-xSrxCuO4 system occurs as localized defects of predominantly Cud3z^2-r^2--Opz character associated with the Sr dopants accompanied by a local destruction of the Jahn-Teller distortion. While the structural parameters behave qualitatively according to the prediction of this model, a quantitative analysis indicates that doped holes predominantly appear in the planar Cudx^2-y^2--Opx,y band as is normally assumed. However, a small amount of the doped charge does enter the Cud3z^2-r^2--Opz orbitals and this should be taken into account when theoretical phase diagrams are compared to experiment. We present a calibration curve, p = x (1.00(1) - 0.45(7) x), for the planarcharge doping, p, vs strontium content, x, for the La2-xSrxCuO4 system.
Similar papers
Empirical case for two pseudogaps in cuprate superconductors
similarity 0.88J. M. Tranquada · 2019 · arXiv:1904.10473
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Quantum phase transition from a Antiferromagnetic-Insulator to a Paramagnetic-Metal laying beneath the superconducting dome
similarity 0.88Alvarez, Victor M. Martinez et al. · 2012 · arXiv:1210.6548
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Unusual behavior of cuprates explained by heterogeneous charge localization
similarity 0.88D. Pelc et al. · 2017 · arXiv:1710.10221
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
What is the true charge transfer gap in parent insulating cuprates?
similarity 0.88A. S. Moskvin · 2011 · arXiv:1105.3159
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Understanding electron-doped cuprate superconductors as hole superconductors
similarity 0.88J. E. Hirsch & F. Marsiglio · 2019 · arXiv:1904.09164
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Charge carriers of different origin in cuprates as revealed by experiment
similarity 0.88Gor'kov, Lev P. & Teitel'baum, Gregory B. · 2006 · arXiv:cond-mat/0607010
Source status unknown — claims are unverified