Measurement of coherent charge transfer in an adiabatic Cooper pair pump
Rosario Fazio, F. W. J. Hekking, J. P. Pekola
arXiv:cond-mat/0302383 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.68.054510 · 2003-02-19 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We study adiabatic charge transfer in a superconducting Cooper pair pump, focusing on the influence of current measurement on coherence. We investigate the limit where the Josephson coupling energy $E_J$ between the various parts of the system is small compared to the Coulomb charging energy $E_C$. In this case the charge transferred in a pumping cycle $Q_P \sim 2e$, the charge of one Cooper pair: the main contribution is due to incoherent Cooper pair tunneling. We are particularly interested in the quantum correction to $Q_P$, which is due to coherent tunneling of pairs across the pump and which depends on the superconducting phase difference $φ_0$ between the electrodes: $1-Q_P/(2e) \sim (E_J/E_C) \cos φ_0$. A measurement of $Q_P$ tends to destroy the phase coherence. We first study an arbitrary measuring circuit and then specific examples and show that coherent Cooper pair transfer can in principle be detected using an inductively shunted ammeter.
Similar papers
Turnstile behaviour of the Cooper-pair pump
similarity 0.89J. J. Toppari et al. · 2003 · arXiv:cond-mat/0311135
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Fast and accurate Cooper pair pump
similarity 0.89Paolo Andrea Erdman et al. · 2019 · arXiv:1909.13627
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Cooper-pair qubit and Cooper-pair electrometer in one device
similarity 0.88A. B. Zorin · 2001 · arXiv:cond-mat/0112351
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Coherent superconducting quantum pump
similarity 0.88F. Hoehne et al. · 2011 · arXiv:1109.5543
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Emission of photon multiplets by a dc-biased superconducting circuit
similarity 0.88G. C. Ménard et al. · 2021 · arXiv:2111.09604
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Decoherence in circuits of small Josephson junctions
similarity 0.87J. P. Pekola & J. J. Toppari · 2001 · arXiv:cond-mat/0102349
Source status unknown — claims are unverified