Magnetic field and pressure effects on charge density wave, superconducting, and magnetic states in Lu$_5$Ir$_4$Si$_{10}$ and Er$_5$Ir$_4$Si$_{10}$
M. H. Jung, H. C. Kim, F. Galli, J. A. Mydosh
arXiv:cond-mat/0304328 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.68.132102 · 2003-04-15 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We have studied the charge-density-wave (CDW) state for the superconducting Lu$_5$Ir$_4$Si$_{10}$ and the antiferromagnetic Er$_5$Ir$_4$Si$_{10}$ as variables of temperature, magnetic field, and hydrostatic pressure. For Lu$_5$Ir$_4$Si$_{10}$, the application of pressure strongly suppresses the CDW phase but weakly enhances the superconducting phase. For Er$_5$Ir$_4$Si$_{10}$, the incommensurate CDW state is pressure independent and the commensurate CDW state strongly depends on the pressure, whereas the antiferromagnetic ordering is slightly depressed by applying pressure. In addition, Er$_5$Ir$_4$Si$_{10}$ shows negative magnetoresistance at low temperatures, compared with the positive magnetoresistance of Lu$_5$Ir$_4$Si$_{10}$.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lu5Ir4Si10 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 3.9 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Lu5Ir4Si10 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 9.1 | 2.14 GPa | unknown |
| Lu5Ir4Si10 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 3.9 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Magnetic-field and pressure effects on charge-density-wave, superconducting, and magnetic states in Lu5Ir4Si10 and Er5Ir4Si10
similarity 0.93M. H. Jung et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Phase transitions in the superconducting compound Lu5Rh4Si10 at ambient and high pressure
similarity 0.89H. D. Yang et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Competition between superconductivity and charge-density-wave ordering in the Lu5Ir4(Si1−xGex)10 alloy system
similarity 0.88Yogesh Singh et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Evidence for strongly coupled charge-density-wave ordering in three-dimensional RE5Ir4Si10 compounds by optical measurements
similarity 0.88Riccardo Tediosi et al. · 2008 · arXiv:0812.1214
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Competition between superconductivity and charge-density waves in the pseudoternary system (Lu1−xScx)5Ir4Si10
similarity 0.88H. D. Yang et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Charge Density Wave and Superconducting Properties in Single Crystals of Lu5Ir4Si10
similarity 0.88Maxime Leroux et al. · 2013 · arXiv:1301.2657
Source status unknown — claims are unverified