Electron-phonon interaction in ultrasmall-radius carbon nanotubes
Ryan Barnett, Eugene Demler, Efthimios Kaxiras
arXiv:cond-mat/0305006 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.71.035429 · 2003-04-30 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We perform analysis of the band structure, phonon dispersion, and electron-phonon interactions in three types of small-radius carbon nanotubes. We find that the (5,5) can be described well by the zone-folding method and the electron-phonon interaction is too small to support either a charge-density wave or superconductivity at realistic temperatures. For ultra-small (5,0) and (6,0) nanotubes we find that the large curvature makes these tubes metallic with a large density of states at the Fermi energy and leads to unusual electron-phonon interactions, with the dominant coupling coming from the out-of-plane phonon modes. By combining the frozen-phonon approximation with the RPA analysis of the giant Kohn anomaly in 1d we find parameters of the effective Frölich Hamiltonian for the conduction electrons. Neglecting Coulomb interactions, we find that the (5,5) CNT remains stable to instabilities of the Fermi surface down to very low temperatures while for the (5,0) and (6,0) CNTs a CDW instability will occur. When we include a realistic model of Coulomb interaction we find that the charge-density wave remains dominant in the (6,0) CNT with $T_{\rm CDW}$ around 5 K while the charge-density wave instability is suppressed to very low temperatures in the (5,0) CNT, making superconductivity dominant with transition temperature around one Kelvin.
Similar papers
Superconducting and charge-density wave instabilities in ultrasmall-radius carbon nanotubes
similarity 0.96Ryan Barnett et al. · 2004 · arXiv:cond-mat/0407644
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Electron-phonon coupling and superconductivity in double-walled carbon nanotubes
similarity 0.90Jesse Noffsinger & Marvin L. Cohen
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
On superconductivity in armchair carbon nanotubes
similarity 0.88A. Sédéki et al. · 2001 · arXiv:cond-mat/0111296
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Static conductivity and superconductivity of carbon nanotubes: Relations between tubes and sheets
similarity 0.88Lorin X. Benedict et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Singlet superconductivity phase in carbon nanotubes
similarity 0.88Kenji Kamide et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Lattice dynamics and electron-phonon interaction in (3,3) carbon nanotubes
similarity 0.88K. -P. Bohnen et al. · 2004 · arXiv:cond-mat/0411515
Source status unknown — claims are unverified