Theory of the quasiparticle interference patterns in the pseudogap phase of the cuprate superconductors
T. Pereg-Barnea, M. Franz
arXiv:cond-mat/0306712 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.68.180506 · 2003-06-30 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
A method is proposed to test for the nature of the pseudogap phase in cuprates using the recently developed technique of Fourier transform scanning tunneling spectroscopy. We show that the observed quasiparticle interference patterns depend critically on the quasiparticle coherence factors, making it possible to distinguish between the pseudogap dominated by superconducting fluctuations and by various particle-hole condensates.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8+δ Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
The effect of phase fluctuations on the single-particle properties of the underdoped cuprates
similarity 0.92Hyok-Jon Kwon & Alan T. Dorsey · 1998 · arXiv:cond-mat/9809225
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Equivalence of pseudogap and pairing energy in a cuprate high-temperature superconductor
similarity 0.92Jiasen Niu et al. · 2024 · arXiv:2409.15928
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Quantum Phase Fluctuations Responsible for Pseudogap
similarity 0.91V. P. Gusynin et al. · 2000 · arXiv:cond-mat/0007271
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Spectroscopic distinction between the normal state pseudogap and the superconducting gap of cuprate high T_{c} superconductors
similarity 0.91Li Yu et al. · 2007 · arXiv:0705.0111
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Cuprates phase diagram deduced from magnetic susceptibility: what is the `true' pseudogap line?
similarity 0.91Yves Noat et al. · 2022 · arXiv:2202.02589
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Failure of Scattering Interference in the Pseudogap State of Cuprate Superconductors
similarity 0.91S. Misra et al. · 2004 · arXiv:cond-mat/0405204
Source status unknown — claims are unverified