Two Pseudogaps in the Cuprates: Meingast et al. Reply
C. Meingast, V. Pasler, P. Nagel, A. Rykov, S. Tajima, P. Olsson
arXiv:cond-mat/0307203 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.229704 · 2003-07-09 · Physical Review Letters
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
In classical superconductors Cooper-pair formation and phase coherence occur simultaneously as the temperature is lowered below Tc. In high-temperature superconductors (HTSC), on the other hand, the small superfluid density and low associated phase stiffness of the superconducting condensate are expected to lead to a separation of the Cooper-pair formation and the phase-coherence temperatures, especially in underdoped materials [3]. The only real phase transition in this scenario is the 3d-XY phase-ordering transition at Tc [3,4]. In our Letter [2] we showed that Tc in underdoped and optimally doped YBCO is just such a phase-ordering temperature, and then the question naturally arises - where do the Cooper pairs form? The observed 3d-XY scaling of our thermal expansion data over a wide temperature range [2] suggests that pairing occurs at temperatures considerably above Tc, and it thus appeared quite natural for us to associate the opening of the pseudogap at T*.
Similar papers
Two Pseudogaps in the Cuprates
similarity 0.92R. S. Markiewicz · 2001 · arXiv:cond-mat/0108075
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
The pseudogap in high-temperature superconductors: an experimental survey
similarity 0.90T. Timusk & B. W. Statt · 1999 · arXiv:cond-mat/9905219
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Parametrically amplified Josephson plasma waves in YBa_2Cu_3O_(6+x): evidence for local superconducting fluctuations up to the pseudogap temperature
similarity 0.89Marios H. Michael et al. · 2026 · arXiv:2505.03358
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconducting Fluctuations, Pseudogap and Phase Diagram in Cuprates
similarity 0.89H. Alloul et al. · 2010 · arXiv:1006.3165
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Non-interacting Cooper pairs inside a pseudogap
similarity 0.89O. Tchernyshyov · 1997 · arXiv:cond-mat/9705124
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Photoemission perspective on pseudogap, superconducting fluctuations, and charge order in cuprates: a review of recent progress
similarity 0.89Inna Vishik · 2018 · arXiv:1803.11228
Source status unknown — claims are unverified