Evidence of two-dimensional macroscopic quantum tunneling of a current-biased DC-SQUID
F. Balestro, J. Claudon, J. P. Pekola, O. Buisson
arXiv:cond-mat/0308559 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.158301 · 2003-08-27 · Physical review letters
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
The escape probability out of the superconducting state of a hysteretic DC-SQUID has been measured at different values of the applied magnetic flux. At low temperature, the escape current and the width of the probability distribution are temperature independent but they depend on flux. Experimental results do not fit the usual one-dimensional (1D) Macroscopic Quantum Tunneling (MQT) law but are perfectly accounted for by the two-dimensional (2D) MQT behaviour as we propose here. Near zero flux, our data confirms the recent MQT observation in a DC-SQUID \cite{Li02}.
Similar papers
Evidence of Two-Dimensional Macroscopic Quantum Tunneling of a Current-Biased dc SQUID
similarity 0.94F. Balestro et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Macroscopic Quantum Tunneling and Thermal Activation from Metastable States in a dc SQUID
similarity 0.90F. Sharifi et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Flux Dependent Crossover Between Quantum and Classical Behavior in a dc-SQUID
similarity 0.89Susanne Butz et al. · 2014 · arXiv:1404.3602
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Large output voltage to magnetic flux change in nanoSQUIDs based on direct-write Focused Ion Beam Induced Deposition technique
similarity 0.88Fabian Sigloch et al. · 2022 · arXiv:2203.05278
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Macroscopic quantum tunneling in high- superconductors: the role of collective charge oscillations
similarity 0.88M. V. Fistul · 2006 · arXiv:cond-mat/0606751
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Protecting SQUID metamaterials against stray magnetic field
similarity 0.88S. Butz et al. · 2013 · arXiv:1305.2910
Source status unknown — claims are unverified