Superconductor-proximity effect in hybrid structures: Fractality versus Chaos
A. Ossipov, Tsampikos Kottos
arXiv:cond-mat/0308592 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.017004 · 2003-08-28 · Physical review letters
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We study the proximity effect of a superconductor to a normal system with fractal spectrum. We find that there is no gap in the excitation spectrum, even in the case where the underlying classical dynamics of the normal system is chaotic. An analytical expression for the distribution of the smallest excitation eigenvalue $E_g$ of the hybrid structure is obtained.On small scales it decays algebraically as ${\cal P}(E_g)\sim E_g ^{-D_0}$, where $D_0$ is the fractal dimension of the spectrum of the normal system. Our theoretical predictions are verified by numerical calculations performed for various models.
Similar papers
Superconductor-Proximity Effect in Hybrid Structures: Fractality versus Chaos
similarity 0.89Alexander Ossipov & Tsampikos Kottos
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
"Smile"-gap in the density of states of a cavity between superconductors
similarity 0.88J. Reutlinger et al. · 2013 · arXiv:1308.2529
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconductors with Magnetic Impurities: Instantons and Sub-gap States
similarity 0.88A Lamacraft & B D Simons · 2001 · arXiv:cond-mat/0101080
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Density of States below the Thouless Gap in a Mesoscopic SNS Junction
similarity 0.88P. M. Ostrovsky et al. · 2000 · arXiv:cond-mat/0012478
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Ehrenfest-time-dependent excitation gap in a chaotic Andreev billiard
similarity 0.88I. Adagideli & C. W. J. Beenakker · 2002 · arXiv:cond-mat/0202206
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconducting proximity effect in quantum wires without time-reversal symmetry
similarity 0.88M. A. Skvortsov et al. · 2012 · arXiv:1211.0202
Source status unknown — claims are unverified