Hamiltonian for coupled flux qubits
Alec Maassen van den Brink
arXiv:cond-mat/0310425 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.71.064503 · 2003-10-17 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
An effective Hamiltonian is derived for two coupled three-Josephson-junction (3JJ) qubits. This is not quite trivial, for the customary "free" 3JJ Hamiltonian is written in the limit of zero inductance L. Neglecting the self-flux is already dubious for one qubit when it comes to readout, and becomes untenable when discussing inductive coupling. First, inductance effects are analyzed for a single qubit. For small L, the self-flux is a "fast variable" which can be eliminated adiabatically. However, the commonly used junction phases are_not_ appropriate "slow variables", and instead one introduces degrees of freedom which are decoupled from the loop current to leading order. In the quantum case, the zero-point fluctuations (LC oscillations) in the loop current diverge as L->0. Fortunately, they merely renormalize the Josephson couplings of the effective (two-phase) theory. In the coupled case, the strong zero-point fluctuations render the full (six-phase) wave function significantly entangled in leading order. However, in going to the four-phase theory, this uncontrollable entanglement is integrated out completely, leaving a computationally usable mutual-inductance term of the expected form as the effective interaction.
Similar papers
Decoherence of Flux Qubits Coupled to Electronic Circuits
similarity 0.89F. K. Wilhelm et al. · 2003 · arXiv:cond-mat/0305349
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Evidence for entangled states of two coupled flux qubits
similarity 0.89A. Izmalkov et al. · 2003 · arXiv:cond-mat/0312332
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Tunable coupling of transmission-line microwave resonators mediated by an rf SQUID
similarity 0.89F. Wulschner et al. · 2015 · arXiv:1508.06758
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Circuit QED with a Flux Qubit Strongly Coupled to a Coplanar Transmission Line Resonator
similarity 0.89T. Lindstrom et al. · 2007 · arXiv:0704.0727
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Charge-SQUID and Tunable Phase-slip Flux Qubit
similarity 0.89Hu Zhao et al. · 2013 · arXiv:1303.5166
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Tunable coupling scheme for flux qubits at the optimal point
similarity 0.89Antti O. Niskanen et al. · 2005 · arXiv:cond-mat/0512238
Source status unknown — claims are unverified