London's limit for the lattice superconductor
S. A. Ktitorov
arXiv:cond-mat/0312209 · DOI 10.1134/1.1825538 · 2003-12-08 · Physics of the Solid State
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
A stability problem for the current state of the strong coupling superconductor has been considered within the lattice Ginzburg-Landau model. The critical current problem for a thin superconductor film is solved within the London limit taking into account the crystal lattice symmetry. The current dependence on the order parameter modulus is computed for the superconductor film for various coupling parameter magnitudes. The field penetration problem is shown to be described in this case by the one-dimensional sine-Gordon equation. The field distribution around the vortex is described at the same time by the two-dimensional elliptic sine-Gordon equation.
Similar papers
Vortices with magnetic field inversion in noncentrosymmetric superconductors
similarity 0.89Julien Garaud et al. · 2020 · arXiv:2003.10917
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Moving Pearl vortices in thin-film superconductors
similarity 0.89V. G. Kogan & N. Nakagawa · 2021 · arXiv:2102.00073
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Vortex structure and intervortex interaction in superconducting structures with intrinsic diode effect
similarity 0.89A. V. Putilov et al. · 2025 · arXiv:2506.22209
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Current states in superconducting films: numerical results and approximations
similarity 0.88E. V. Bezuglyi · 2014 · arXiv:1402.0230
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Annular Vortex Solutions to the Landau-Ginzburg Equations in Mesoscopic Superconductors
similarity 0.88Jan Govaerts et al. · 1999 · arXiv:cond-mat/9908451
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Nonlinear Magnetization in Superconductors with s+d Ordering
similarity 0.88Joseph Betouras & Robert Joynt · 1997 · arXiv:cond-mat/9704082
Source status unknown — claims are unverified