Impurity Effects on the Superconducting Transition Temperature of NazCoO2.yH2O
M. Yokoi, H. Watanabe, Y. Mori, T. Moyoshi, Y. Kobayashi, M. Sato
arXiv:cond-mat/0312242 · DOI 10.1143/JPSJ.73.1297 · 2003-12-10 · Journal of the Physical Society of Japan
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Superconducting transition temperature Tc of NazCo1-xMxO2.yH2O has been studied for M=Ir and Ga, which can substitute for Co. It has been found that Tc is suppressed by the M-atom doping. The decreasing rates |dTc/dx| are of the order of 1 K/% and too small to be explained by the pair breaking mechanism for the anisotropic order parameters by non-magnetic impurities. Brief arguments are given on possible origins of the Tc suppression.
Similar papers
Impurity effect and suppression to superconductivity in Na(FeCoT)As (T=Cu, Mn)
similarity 0.89Qiang Deng et al. · 2013 · arXiv:1308.1356
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Nuclear spin-lattice relaxation rate in the D1+iD2 superconducting state: Implications for CoO superconductor
similarity 0.88Yunkyu Bang et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Large decrease in the critical temperature of superconducting LaFeAsO0.85 compounds doped with 3% atomic weight of nonmagnetic Zn impurities
similarity 0.87Y. F. Guo et al. · 2010 · arXiv:1006.2874
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Comparison of paramagnetic- and nonmagnetic-impurity effects on superconductivity in Nd1.85Ce0.15CuO4
similarity 0.87Jun Sugiyama et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Effect of Spatial Variations of the Superconducting Gap on Suppression of the Transition Temperature by Impurities
similarity 0.87M. E. Zhitomirsky & M. B. Walker
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconductivity suppression of Ba0.5K0.5Fe2-2xM2xAs2 single crystals by substitution of transition-metal (M = Mn, Ru, Co, Ni, Cu, and Zn)
similarity 0.86Jun Li et al. · 2012 · arXiv:1206.0811
Source status unknown — claims are unverified