Interface steps in field effect devices
S. Wehrli, C. Helm
arXiv:cond-mat/0312441 · DOI 10.1063/1.1710707 · 2003-12-17 · Journal of Applied Physics
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
The charge doped into a semiconductor in a field effect transistor (FET) is generally confined to the interface of the semiconductor. A planar step at the interface causes a potential drop due to the strong electric field of the FET, which in turn is screened by the doped carriers. We analyze the dipolar electronic structure of a single step in the Thomas-Fermi approximation and find that the transmission coefficient through the step is exponentially suppressed by the electric field and the induced carrier density as well as by the step height. In addition, the field enhancement at the step edge can facilitate the electric breakthrough of the insulating layer. We suggest that these two effects may lead to severe problems when engineering FET devices with very high doping. On the other hand steps can give rise to interesting physics in superconducting FETs by forming weak links and potentially creating atomic size Josephson junctions.
Similar papers
Advanced superconducting circuits and devices
similarity 0.86Martin Weides & Hannes Rotzinger · 2014 · arXiv:1402.6857
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Floquet engineering of many-body states by the ponderomotive potential
similarity 0.85Zhiyuan Sun · 2023 · arXiv:2312.04892
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Andreev reflection in normal metal/charge-4e superconductor junctions
similarity 0.85Yi-Xin Dai & Qing-Feng Sun · 2024 · arXiv:2410.21692
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Multifaceted impact of a surface step on superconductivity in atomically thin films
similarity 0.84L. -F. Zhang et al. · 2017 · arXiv:1702.02370
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Critical current in SFIFS junctions
similarity 0.84A. A. Golubov et al. · 2002 · arXiv:cond-mat/0201249
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Tunneling processes between Yu-Shiba-Rusinov bound states
similarity 0.84A. Villas et al. · 2022 · arXiv:2209.09599
Source status unknown — claims are unverified