Effects of next-nearest-neighbor hopping $t^{\prime}$ on the electronic structure of cuprates

K. Tanaka; T. Yoshida; A. Fujimori; D. H. Lu; Z. -X. Shen; X. -J. Zhou; H. Eisaki; Z. Hussain; S. Uchida; Y. Aiura; K. Ono; T. Sugaya; T. Mizuno; I. Terasaki

doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.70.092503

Effects of next-nearest-neighbor hopping $t^{\prime}$ on the electronic structure of cuprates

K. Tanaka, T. Yoshida, A. Fujimori, D. H. Lu, Z. -X. Shen, X. -J. Zhou, H. Eisaki, Z. Hussain, S. Uchida, Y. Aiura, K. Ono, T. Sugaya, T. Mizuno, I. Terasaki

arXiv:cond-mat/0312575 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.70.092503 · 2003-12-22 · Physical Review B

T2theoretical24 citations

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

Photoemission spectra of underdoped and lightly-doped Bi$_{2-z}$Pb$_z$Sr$_2$Ca$_{1-x}${\it R}$_{x}$Cu$_2$O$_{8+y}$ ($R=$ Pr, Er) (BSCCO) have been measured and compared with those of La$_{2-x}$Sr$_x$CuO$_4$ (LSCO). The lower-Hubbard band of the insulating BSCCO, like Ca$_2$CuO$_2$Cl$_2$, shows a stronger dispersion than La$_2$CuO$_4$ from ${\bf k}\sim$($π/2,π/2$) to $\sim$($π,0$). The flat band at ${\bf k}\sim$($π,0$) is found generally deeper in BSCCO. These observations together with the Fermi-surface shapes and the chemical potential shifts indicate that the next-nearest-neighbor hopping $|t^{\prime}|$ of the single-band model is larger in BSCCO than in LSCO and that $|t^{\prime}|$ rather than the super-exchange $J$ influences the pseudogap energy scale.

Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval

Formula	Reported Tc (K)	Pressure (GPa)	Type
La1.93Sr0.07CuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.	14	Pressure not reported	unknown
La1.90Sr0.10CuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.	29	Pressure not reported	unknown
La1.85Sr0.15CuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.	41	Pressure not reported	unknown
La1.78Sr0.22CuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.	20	Pressure not reported	unknown
Bi2Sr2ErCu2O8 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.	—	Pressure not reported	unknown
Bi2Sr2Ca0.5Er0.5Cu2O8 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.	—	Pressure not reported	unknown
Bi2Sr2Ca0.9Er0.1Cu2O8 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.	87	Pressure not reported	unknown
Bi2Sr2Ca0.57Pr0.43Cu2O8 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.	48	Pressure not reported	unknown
Bi2Sr2Ca0.75Pr0.25Cu2O8 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.	88	Pressure not reported	unknown
Bi2Sr2Ca0.9Pr0.1Cu2O8 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.	86	Pressure not reported	unknown
Bi1.2Pb0.8Sr2ErCu2O8 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.	—	Pressure not reported	unknown