Why Are Cuprates the Only High-Temperature Superconductors?
J. C. Phillips
arXiv:cond-mat/0402111 · DOI 10.1080/14786430412331314645 · 2004-02-04 · Philosophical Magazine
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
The heirarchical mean-field theory of elastic networks, originally developed by Maxwell to discuss the stability of scaffolds, and recently applied to atomic networks by Phillips and Thorpe, explains the phase diagrams and remarkable superconductive properties of cuprates as the result of giant electron-phonon interactions in a marginally unstable mechanical network. The overall cuprate networks are fragile (floppy), as shown quantitatively (with an accuracy ~1 percent), and without adjustable parameters, by comparison with stabilities of generically similar network glasses, and are stabilized by percolative backbones composed of CuO2 planes.
Similar papers
High Temperature Superconductivity in the Cuprates: Phenomena from a Theorist's Point of View
similarity 0.88T. V. Ramakrishnan · 2025 · arXiv:2501.02351
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Emergence of superconductivity in the cuprates via a universal percolation process
similarity 0.88Damjan Pelc et al. · 2017 · arXiv:1710.10219
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
From high temperature supercondutivity to quantum spin liquid: progress in strong correlation physics
similarity 0.87Patrick A. Lee · 2007 · arXiv:0708.2115
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
High Temperature Superconductivity in the Cuprates
similarity 0.87B. Keimer et al. · 2014 · arXiv:1409.4673
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
How optimal inhomogeneity produces high temperature superconductivity
similarity 0.86Steven A. Kivelson & Eduardo Fradkin · 2005 · arXiv:cond-mat/0507459
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Mean-field theories of cuprate superconductors: A systematic analysis
similarity 0.86M. Grilli et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified