Cavity QED in superconducting circuits: susceptibility at elevated temperatures
Ileana Rau, Göran Johansson, Alexander Shnirman
arXiv:cond-mat/0403257 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.70.054521 · 2004-03-09 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We study the properties of superconducting electrical circuits, realizing cavity QED. In particular we explore the limit of strong coupling, low dissipation, and elevated temperatures relevant for current and future experiments. We concentrate on the cavity susceptibility as it can be directly experimentally addressed, i.e., as the impedance or the reflection coefficient of the cavity. To this end we investigate the dissipative Jaynes-Cummings model in the strong coupling regime at high temperatures. The dynamics is investigated within the Bloch-Redfield formalism. At low temperatures, when only the few lowest levels are occupied the susceptibility can be presented as a sum of contributions from independent level-to-level transitions. This corresponds to the secular (random phase) approximation in the Bloch-Redfield formalism. At temperatures comparable to and higher than the oscillator frequency, many transitions become important and a multiple-peak structure appears. We show that in this regime the secular approximation breaks down, as soon as the peaks start to overlap. In other words, the susceptibility is no longer a sum of contributions from independent transitions. We treat the dynamics of the system numerically by exact diagonalization of the Hamiltonian of the qubit plus up to 200 states of the oscillator. We compare the results obtained with and without the secular approximation and find a qualitative discrepancy already at moderate temperatures.
Similar papers
Cavity quantum electrodynamics in superconducting circuits: Susceptibility at elevated temperatures
similarity 0.90Ileana Rau et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Deep Strong Coupling Regime of the Jaynes-Cummings model
similarity 0.90J. Casanova et al. · 2010 · arXiv:1008.1240
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Electron-photon coupling in Mesoscopic Quantum Electrodynamics
similarity 0.89Audrey Cottet et al. · 2015 · arXiv:1501.00803
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Entanglement of superconducting charge qubits by homodyne measurement
similarity 0.89D. A. Rodrigues et al. · 2007 · arXiv:0708.2880
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Decoherence of superconducting qubits caused by quasiparticle tunneling
similarity 0.89G. Catelani et al. · 2012 · arXiv:1207.7084
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Quantum Simulation of the Ultrastrong Coupling Dynamics in Circuit QED
similarity 0.89D. Ballester et al. · 2011 · arXiv:1107.5748
Source status unknown — claims are unverified