← Back to search

Systematic study of the two band/two gap superconductivity in carbon-substituted MgB2 by point-contact spectroscopy

Z. Holanova, P. Szabo, P. Samuely, R. H. T. Wilke, S. L. Bud'ko, P. C. Canfield

arXiv:cond-mat/0404096 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.70.064520 · 2004-04-05 · Physical Review B

T2theoretical39 citations

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

Point-contact measurements on the carbon-substituted Mg(B$_{1-x}$C$_x$)$_2$ filament/powder samples directly reveal a retention of the two superconducting energy gaps in the whole doping range from $x = 0$ to $x \approx 0.1$. The large gap on the $σ$-band is decreased in an essentially linear fashion with increasing the carbon concentrations. The changes in the the small gap $Δ_π$ up to 3.8 % C are proportionally smaller and are more difficult to detect but for the heavily doped sample with $x \approx 0.1$ and $T_c = 22$ K both gaps are still present, and significantly reduced, consistent with a strong essentially linear, reduction of each gap with the transition temperature.

Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval

FormulaReported Tc (K)Pressure (GPa)Type
Mg(B0.9C0.1)2

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

22Pressure not reportedunknown
MgB2

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

39Pressure not reportedonset
Mg(B0.979C0.021)2

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

37.5Pressure not reportedonset
Mg(B0.962C0.038)2

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

36.2Pressure not reportedonset

Similar papers