← Back to search

F/S interfaces: point contact versus atomic thickness geometries

R. Mélin

arXiv:cond-mat/0406280 · 2004-06-11 · arXiv: Mesoscale and Nanoscale Physics

T3

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

We contrast perturbative expansions of ferromagnet / superconductor interfaces in two geometries: (i) a point contact geometry where a single weak link connects a 3D ferromagnet to a 3D superconductor and (ii) an atomic thickness geometry with an infinite planar interface connecting a quasi-2D ferromagnet to a quasi-2D superconductor. Perturbation theories are rather different in the two approaches but they both break down at order $t^4$ ($t$ is the tunnel amplitude). The regimes of strong ferromagnets are in a qualitative agreement in both geometries. The regime of weak ferromagnets exists only for the atomic thickness geometry and is related to Andreev bound states due to lateral confinement in the superconductor.

Similar papers