Correlation-induced suppression of decoherence in capacitively coupled Cooper-pair boxes
J. Q. You, Xuedong Hu, Franco Nori
arXiv:cond-mat/0407423 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.72.144529 · 2004-07-16 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Charge fluctuations from gate bias and background traps severely limit the performance of a charge qubit in a Cooper-pair box (CPB). Here we present an experimentally realizable method to control the decoherence effects of these charge fluctuations using two strongly capacitively coupled CPBs. This coupled-box system has a low-decoherence subspace of two states. Our results show that the inter-box Coulomb correlation can help significantly suppress decoherence of this two-level system, making it a promising candidate as a logical qubit, encoded using two CPBs.
Similar papers
Correlation-induced suppression of decoherence in capacitively coupled Cooper-pair boxes
similarity 0.93J. Q. You et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Rapid state purification protocols for a Cooper pair box
similarity 0.91E. J. Griffith et al. · 2006 · arXiv:quant-ph/0610044
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Josephson charge-phase qubit with radio frequency readout: coupling and decoherence
similarity 0.90A. B. Zorin · 2003 · arXiv:cond-mat/0312225
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Circuit QED and engineering charge based superconducting qubits
similarity 0.89S M Girvin et al. · 2009 · arXiv:0912.3902
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Cooper Pair Box Coupled to a Current-Biased Josephson Junction
similarity 0.89F. W. J. Hekking et al. · 2002 · arXiv:cond-mat/0201284
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Berry connection from many-body wave functions and superconductivity: Circuit quantization for superconducting qubits and absence of a dissipative quantum phase transition in Josephson junctions
similarity 0.89Hiroyasu Koizumi · 2021 · arXiv:2108.05468
Source status unknown — claims are unverified