Competing orders in one dimensional spin 3/2 fermionic systems
Congjun Wu
arXiv:cond-mat/0409247 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.266404 · 2004-09-09 · Physical review letters
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Novel competing orders are found in spin 3/2 cold atomic systems in one-dimensional optical traps and lattices. In particular, the quartetting phase, a four-fermion counterpart of Cooper pairing, exists in a large portion of the phase diagram. The transition between the quartetting and singlet Cooper pairing phases is controlled by an Ising symmetry breaking effect in one of the spin channels. The singlet Cooper pairing phase also survives in the purely repulsive interaction regime. In addition, various charge and bond ordered phases are identified at commensurate fillings in lattice systems.
Similar papers
"Pair" Fermi contour and repulsion-induced superconductivity in cuprates
similarity 0.88V. I. Belyavsky & Yu. V. Kopaev · 2002 · arXiv:cond-mat/0203138
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Cooper Pairs with Broken Parity and Time-Reversal Symmetries in D-wave Superconductors
similarity 0.88A. G. Lebed · 2005 · arXiv:cond-mat/0507692
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Identifying spin-triplet pairing in spin-orbit coupled multi-band superconductors
similarity 0.88Christoph M. Puetter & Hae-Young Kee · 2011 · arXiv:1101.4656
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Competing Orders in Coupled Luttinger Liquids
similarity 0.87Congjun Wu et al. · 2002 · arXiv:cond-mat/0206248
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Confinement vs Deconfinement of Cooper Pairs in One-Dimensional Spin-3/2 Fermionic Cold Atoms
similarity 0.87S. Capponi et al. · 2006 · arXiv:cond-mat/0612456
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Quintet pairing and non-Abelian vortex string in spin-3/2 cold atomic systems
similarity 0.87Congjun Wu et al. · 2005 · arXiv:cond-mat/0512602
Source status unknown — claims are unverified