Bernoulli potential in type-I and weak type-II superconductors: III. Electrostatic potential above the vortex lattice
Pavel Lipavský, Klaus Morawetz, Jan Koláček, Ji{ř}í J. Mareš, Ernst Helmut Brandt, Michael Schreiber
arXiv:cond-mat/0409397 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.71.024526 · 2004-09-15 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
The electrostatic potential above the Abrikosov vortex lattice, discussed earlier by Blatter {\em et al.} {[}PRL {\bf 77}, 566 (1996){]}, is evaluated within the Ginzburg-Landau theory. Unlike previous studies we include the surface dipole. Close to the critical temperature, the surface dipole reduces the electrostatic potential to values below a sensitivity of recent sensors. At low temperatures the surface dipole is less effective and the electrostatic potential remains observable as predicted earlier.
Similar papers
Bernoulli potential in type-I and weak type-II superconductors. III. Electrostatic potential above the vortex lattice
similarity 0.90Pavel Lipavský et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
The concept of correlated density and its application
similarity 0.90Klaus Morawetz et al. · 2006 · arXiv:cond-mat/0612080
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Boundary condition for Ginzburg-Landau theory of superconducting layers
similarity 0.90Jan Kolacek et al. · 2009 · arXiv:0901.4244
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Ground State Description of a Single Vortex in an Atomic Fermi gas: From BCS to Bose-Einstein Condensation
similarity 0.89Chih-Chun Chien et al. · 2005 · arXiv:cond-mat/0510647
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Budd-Vannimenus theorem for superconductors
similarity 0.89Pavel Lipavský et al. · 2002 · arXiv:cond-mat/0212152
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Bernoulli potential at a superconductor surface
similarity 0.89Pavel Lipavsky et al. · 2001 · arXiv:cond-mat/0104192
Source status unknown — claims are unverified