Calculation of Penetration Depth and $T_c$ in $κ$-$($ET$)_2$Cu(NCS)$_2$ under Pressure
Kazunori Tanaka, Hiroaki Ikeda, Kosaku Yamada
arXiv:cond-mat/0409633 · DOI 10.1143/JPSJ.73.3394 · 2004-09-24 · Journal of the Physical Society of Japan
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
The pressure dependence of the inverse square of the magnetic penetration depth $λ^{- 2}$ in $κ$-$($ET$)_2$Cu(NCS)$_2$ was measured by Larkin, et al According to the paper, $λ^{- 2}$ behaves differently under low pressure and under high pressure. Under low pressure, the development of $λ^{- 2}$ just below $T=T_c$ is rapid compared to the case under high pressure. Moreover, $T_c$ in $κ$-$($ET$)_2$Cu(NCS)$_2$ increases under c-axis pressure up to 1kbar and decreases under higher pressure, while $T_c$ decreases monotonically under the hydrostatic pressure, or under the uniaxial pressure parallel to other axes. In order to explain these behaviors, we calculate $T_c$ and $λ^{- 2}$ for $κ$-$($ET$)_2$Cu(NCS)$_2$ under pressure. In the calculation we mainly use an effective dimer Hubbard model. In conclusion, the behavior of $λ^{- 2}$ results from three effects: the variation of the bandwidth of quasiparticles, the change of the Fermi surfaces, and the effect of vertex correction. This is a different mechanism from that of $λ^{- 2}$ in cuprates which we observe when the doping varies. Moreover, we explain the increase in $T_c$ under the c-axis pressure up to 1kbar and the decrease in $T_c$ over 1kbar from our calculation. With the increase in the c-axis pressure, two competitive effects with respect to $T_c$ appear. One is the approach of the Fermi surface to the antiferromagnetic Brillouin zone boundary, and the other is the suppression of the electron correlation. Under the low c-axis pressure, $T_c$ increases since the former effect is dominant. On the other hand, $T_c$ decreases since the latter effect is dominant under the high c-axis pressure.
Similar papers
Origin of Superconductivity in 2D-Organic Compounds and High-T_c Cuprates
similarity 0.88Hisashi Kondo & Tôru Moriya · 1999 · arXiv:cond-mat/9909024
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Crossover between BCS Superconductor and Doped Mott Insulator of d-wave Pairing State in Two-Dimensional Hubbard Model
similarity 0.87Hisatoshi Yokoyama et al. · 2012 · arXiv:1208.1102
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Cooper Pairing Revisited
similarity 0.86V. C. Aguilera-Navarro et al. · 2003 · arXiv:cond-mat/0312001
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Pseudogap Phenomena and Superconducting Fluctuations in Hubbard Model for High-Tc Cuprates
similarity 0.86Youichi Yanase & Kosaku Yamada · 2001 · arXiv:cond-mat/0103214
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Strong coupling theory of the interlayer tunneling model for high temperature superconductors
similarity 0.86B. Mitrovic & M. Castle · 1996 · arXiv:supr-con/9608006
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Opening of a pseudogap in a quasi-two dimensional superconductor due to critical thermal fluctuations
similarity 0.86Fusayoshi J. Ohkawa · 2006 · arXiv:cond-mat/0606643
Source status unknown — claims are unverified