← Back to search

The "normal" state of superconducting cuprates might really be normal after all

V. N. Zavaritsky, A. S. Alexandrov

arXiv:cond-mat/0410075 · 2004-10-04 · arXiv: Superconductivity

T1theoretical

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

High magnetic field studies of cuprate superconductors revealed a non-BCS temperature dependence of the upper critical field $H_{c2}(T)$ determined resistively by several groups. These determinations caused some doubts on the grounds of both the contrasting effect of the magnetic field on the in-plane and out-of-plane resistances reported for large Bi2212 sample and the large Nernst signal \emph{well above} $T_{c}$. Here we present both $ρ_{ab}(B)$ and $ρ_{c}(B)$ of tiny Bi2212 crystals in magnetic fields up to 50 Tesla. None of our measurements revealed a situation when on the field increase $ρ_c$ reaches its maximum while $ρ_{ab}$ remains very small if not zero. The resistive %upper critical fields estimated from the in-plane and out-of-plane $H_{c2}(T)$ estimated from $ρ_{ab}(B)$ and $ρ_{c}(B)$ are approximately the same. Our results support any theory of cuprates that describes the state above the resistive phase transition as perfectly normal with a zero off-diagonal order parameter. In particular, the anomalous Nernst effect above the resistive phase transition in high-$T_{c}$ cuprates can be described quantitatively as a normal state phenomenon in a model with itinerant and localised fermions and/or charged bosons.

Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval

FormulaReported Tc (K)Pressure (GPa)Type
Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8+δ

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

89.5Pressure not reportedunknown

Similar papers