QMC Calculation of the Electronic Binding Energy in a C60 Molecule
Fei Lin, Jurij Smakov, Erik S. Sorensen, Catherine Kallin, A. John Berlinsky
arXiv:cond-mat/0411422 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.71.165436 · 2004-11-16 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Electronic energies are calculated for a Hubbard model on the $C_{60}$ molecule using projector quantum Monte Carlo (QMC). Calculations are performed to accuracy high enough to determine the pair binding energy for two electrons added to neutral $C_{60}$. The method itself is checked against a variety of other quantum Monte Carlo methods as well as exact diagonalization for smaller molecules. The conclusion is that the ground state with two extra electrons on one $C_{60}$ molecule is a triplet and, over the range of parameters where QMC is reliable, has a slightly higher energy than the state with electrons on two separate molecules, so that the pair is unbound.
Similar papers
One-electron bands, quantum Monte Carlo, and real superconductors
similarity 0.89Erik Koch & Olle Gunnarsson · 1999 · arXiv:cond-mat/9911335
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconductivity in Fullerides
similarity 0.88Olle Gunnarsson · 1996 · arXiv:cond-mat/9611150
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconductivity in hole-doped C60 from electronic correlations
similarity 0.88M. Granath & S. Östlund
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Finite temperature study of correlations in bilayer band-insulator
similarity 0.87Yogeshwar Prasad · 2022 · arXiv:2206.06085
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconductivity in hole-doped C60 from electronic correlations
similarity 0.87M. Granath & S. Ostlund · 2002 · arXiv:cond-mat/0203324
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Quantum Monte Carlo Study of the Disordered Attractive Hubbard Model
similarity 0.86R. T. Scalettar et al. · 1998 · arXiv:cond-mat/9807008
Source status unknown — claims are unverified