← Back to search

Vortex dynamics differences in YBaCuO at low temperatures for H||ab planes due to twin boundary pinning anysotropy

S. Salem-Sugui,, A. D. Alvarenga, M. Friesen, K. C. Goretta, O. F. Schilling, F. G. Gandra, B. W. Veal, P. Paulikas

arXiv:cond-mat/0412331 · 2004-12-13 · arXiv: Superconductivity

T1theoretical

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

We measured magnetization, M, of a twin-aligned single crystal of YBa2Cu 3Ox (YBaCuO), with Tc = 91 K, as a function of temperature, T, and magnetic field, H, with H applied along the ab planes. Isothermal M-vs.-H and M-vs.-time curves were obtained with H applied parallel and perpendicular to the twin boundary, TB, direction. M-vs.-H curves exhibited two minimums below 38 K, which resembled similar curves that have been obtained in YBaCuO for H parallel to c axis. Above 12 K, the field positions of the minimums for H||TB and HperpTB were quite similar. Below 12 K, the position of the second minimum, Hmin, occurred at a higher field value with H||TB. Below 6 K, only one minimum appeared for both field directions. At low temperatures, these minimums in the M-vs.-H curves produced maximums in the critical current. It was determined that vortex lines were expelled more easily for H||TB than for HperpTB, and, therefore, below a certain field value, that Jc(HperpTB) was larger than Jc(H||TB) . At T<12 K with H||TB, the relaxation rate for flux lines leaving the crystal was found to be different from that for flux entering the crystal. We also observed flux jumps at low temperatures, with their sizes depending on the orientation of magnetic field with respect to the TBs.

Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval

FormulaReported Tc (K)Pressure (GPa)Type
YBa2Cu3Ox

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

91Pressure not reportedunknown

Similar papers