The possible origin of the higher magnetic phase transition in RuSr2Eu1.5Ce0.5Cu2O10 (Ru-1222)
I. Felner, E. Galstyan, I. Nowik
arXiv:cond-mat/0501486 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.71.064510 · 2005-01-20 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Two magnetic transitions are observed in the magneto-superconducting RuEu2-xCexSr2Cu2O10 (Ru-1222), at TM 160 K and TM2~80 K. Below TM2 the Ru moments are weak-ferromagnetically ordered and wide ferromagnetic hysteresis loops are observed, they become narrow and disappear at ~ 60-70 K. Above TM2, (i) small antiferromagnetic-like hysteresis loops reappear with a peak in the coercive fields around 120 K. (ii) A small peak at ~120 K is also observed in the dc and ac susceptibility curves. The two phenomena are absent in the non-SC x=1 samples. For x<1, the decrease of the Ce4+ content, is compensated by non-homogeneous oxygen depletion, which may induce a reduction of Ru5+ ions to Ru4+. The higher ordering temperature, TM, which does not change with x, may result from Ru4+ rich clusters, in which the Ru4+-Ru4+ exchange interactions are stronger than the Ru5+-Ru5+ interactions. In the superconducting Ru1-xMoxSr2Eu1.5Ce0.5Cu2O10 (x=0-0.4) system, TM2 shifts to low temperature with x (14 K for x=0.4), whereas TM is not affected by the Mo content, indicating again that TM may not correspond to the main phase. Two scenarios are suggested to explain the magnetic phenomena at TM2<T< TM. (i) They are due to a small fraction of nano-size islands inside the crystal grains, in which the Ru4+ concentration is high and are magnetically ordered below TM. (ii) The presence of nanoparticles of a foreign minor extra Ru4+ magnetic phase of Sr-Cu-Ru-O3, which orders at TM, in which Cu is distributed inhomogeneously in both the Ru and Sr sites
Similar papers
Magnetism and Superconductivity in RuM1.5Ce0.5Sr2Cu2O10 (M=Eu and Y)
similarity 0.91I. Felner et al. · 2003 · arXiv:cond-mat/0304607
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Coexistence of Superconductivity and Magnetism in R2-xcexrusr2cu 2o10-? (R=Eu and Gd)
similarity 0.91I. Felner · 2002 · arXiv:cond-mat/0211533
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Separation Between Antiferromagnetic and Ferromagnetic Transitions in Ru_1-xCu_xSr_2EuCu_2O_8+d
similarity 0.91Y. Y. Xue et al. · 2003 · arXiv:cond-mat/0304163
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Evidence for Possible Phase-Separations in RuSr2(Gd,Ce)2Cu2O10-delta
similarity 0.90Y. Y. Xue et al. · 2001 · arXiv:cond-mat/0109500
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Magnetic Transitions and Ferromagnetic Clusters in RuSr2(Eu,Ce)2Cu2O10+d
similarity 0.90Y. Y. Xue et al. · 2002 · arXiv:cond-mat/0211342
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
99,101Ru NMR study of EuSr2RuCu2O8: Coexistence of ferromagnetism and superconductivity
similarity 0.90Hironori Sakai et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified