Dynamical Coulomb blockade of multiple Andreev reflections
A. Levy Yeyati, J. C. Cuevas, A. Martin-Rodero
arXiv:cond-mat/0504130 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.056804 · 2005-04-06 · Physical review letters
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We analyze the dynamical Coulomb blockade of multiple Andreev reflections (MAR) in a superconducting quantum point contact coupled to a macroscopic impedance. We find that at very low transmission the blockade scales as $n^2$ with $n = {Int}(2Δ/eV)$, where $V$ is the bias voltage and $Δ$ is the superconducting gap, as it would correspond to the occurrence of "shots" of charge $ne$. For higher transmission the blockade is reduced both due to Pauli principle and to elastic renormalization of the MAR probability, and for certain voltage regions it may even become an "antiblockade", i.e. the current is enhanced due to the coupling with the electromagnetic environment.
Similar papers
Dynamical Coulomb Blockade of Multiple Andreev Reflections
similarity 0.93A. Levy Yeyati et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Keldysh action for disordered superconductors
similarity 0.89M. V. Feigel'man et al. · 1999 · arXiv:cond-mat/9907358
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Theory of ac Josephson effect and noise in superconducting constrictions
similarity 0.88D. V. Averin · 1998 · arXiv:cond-mat/9803065
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Interplay of Andreev reflection and Coulomb blockade in hybrid superconducting single electron transistors
similarity 0.88Laura Sobral Rey et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2306.05758
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Shot noise and Coulomb blockade of Andreev reflection
similarity 0.87A. V. Galaktionov & A. D. Zaikin · 2009 · arXiv:0907.3630
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
On the Excitations of a Balian-Werthamer Superconductor
similarity 0.87J. A. Sauls · 2022 · arXiv:2203.15944
Source status unknown — claims are unverified