Comment on "Domain Structure in a Superconducting Ferromagnet"
E. B. Sonin
arXiv:cond-mat/0505712 · 2005-05-30
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
According to Faure and Buzdin [Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 187202 (2005)], in a superconducting ferromagnet a domain structure with a period small compared with the London penetration depth can arise. They claim that this contradicts to the conclusion of Sonin [Phys. Rev. B, 66, 100504 (2002)] that ferromagnetic domain structure in the Meissner state of a superconducting ferromagnet is absent in equilibrium. This contradiction is imaginary, based on misinterpretation of the results of these two papers.
Similar papers
Reply to "Comment on "Domain Structure in a Superconducting Ferromagnet""
similarity 0.89M. Faure & A. I. Buzdin · 2005 · arXiv:cond-mat/0511517
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Cryptoferromagnetism in Superconductors with Broken Time-Reversal Symmetry
similarity 0.88N. A. Logoboy & E. B. Sonin · 2008 · arXiv:0801.3091
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Phase transitions in the domain structure of ferromagnetic superconductors
similarity 0.87I. M. Khaymovich et al. · 2014 · arXiv:1401.2806
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Domain structure of superconducting ferromagnets
similarity 0.86E. B. Sonin
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Comment on “Domain Structure in a Superconducting Ferromagnet”
similarity 0.85E. B. Sonin
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Size of stripe domains in a superconducting ferromagnet
similarity 0.85Vu Hung Dao et al. · 2011 · arXiv:1107.2608
Source status unknown — claims are unverified