← Back to search

Manipulating vortex motion by thermal and Lorentz force in high temperature superconductors

Z. Wang, L. Shan, Y. Z. Zhang, J. Yan, F. Zhou, J. W. Xiong, W. X. Ti, H. H. Wen

arXiv:cond-mat/0507015 · 2005-07-01

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

By using thermal and Lorentz force, the vortex motion is successfully manipulated in the mixed state of underdoped La$_{2 - x}$Sr$_{x}$CuO$_{4}$ single crystals and optimally doped YBa$_{2}$Cu$_{3}$O$_{7 - δ}$ thin films. A conclusion is drawn that the strong Nernst signal above $T_{c}$ is induced by vortex motion. In the normal state, in order to reduce the dissipative contribution from the quasiparticle scattering and enhance the signal due to the possible vortex motion, a new measurement configuration is proposed. It is found that the in-plane Nernst signal ($H$ $| | $ $c$) can be measurable up to a high temperature in the pseudogap region, while the Abrikosov flux flow dissipation can only be measured up to $T_{c}$. This may point to different vortices below and above $T_{c}$ if we attribute the strong Nernst signal in the pseudogap region to the vortex motion. Below $T_{c}$ the dissipation is induced by the motion of the Abrikosov vortices. Above $T_{c}$ the dissipation may be caused by the motion of the spontaneously generated unbinded vortex-antivortex pairs.

Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval

FormulaReported Tc (K)Pressure (GPa)Type
La1.89Sr0.11CuO4

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

29.3Pressure not reportedunknown
La1.89Sr0.11CuO4

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

29.3Pressure not reportedzero_resistance

Similar papers