Dichotomy in short superconducting nanowires: thermal phase slippage vs. Coulomb blockade
A. T. Bollinger, A. Rogachev, A. Bezryadin
arXiv:cond-mat/0508300 · DOI 10.1209/epl/i2006-10275-5 · 2005-08-11 · EPL
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Quasi-one-dimensional superconductors or nanowires exhibit a transition into a nonsuperconducting regime, as their diameter shrinks. We present measurements on ultrashort nanowires (~40-190 nm long) in the vicinity of this quantum transition. Properties of all wires in the superconducting phase, even those close to the transition, can be explained in terms of thermally activated phase slips. The behavior of nanowires in the nonsuperconducting phase agrees with the theories of the Coulomb blockade of coherent transport through mesoscopic normal metal conductors. Thus it is concluded that the quantum transition occurs between two phases: a "true superconducting phase" and an "insulating phase". No intermediate, "metallic" phase was found.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mo79Ge21 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 1.72 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Mo79Ge21 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 2.28 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Mo79Ge21 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 3.75 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Mo79Ge21 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 3.86 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Mo79Ge21 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 3.8 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Mo79Ge21 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 4.8 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Dynamics of superconducting nanowires shunted with an external resistor
similarity 0.91Matthew W. Brenner et al. · 2012 · arXiv:1202.4526
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
The effect of morphology on the superconductor-insulator transition in 1-D nanowires
similarity 0.89A. T. Bollinger et al. · 2004 · arXiv:cond-mat/0401350
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Resistance in Superconductors
similarity 0.87Bertrand I. Halperin et al. · 2010 · arXiv:1005.3347
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconductor Insulator Transition in Long MoGe Nanowires
similarity 0.87Hyunjeong Kim et al. · 2012 · arXiv:1204.3333
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Influence of high magnetic fields on superconducting transition of one-dimensional Nb and MoGe nanowires
similarity 0.87A. Rogachev et al. · 2004 · arXiv:cond-mat/0411749
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Nanowire Acting as a Superconducting Quantum Interference Device
similarity 0.87A. Johansson et al. · 2005 · arXiv:cond-mat/0505577
Source status unknown — claims are unverified