Inversion techniques for optical conductivity data
E. Schachinger, D. Neuber, J. P. Carbotte
arXiv:cond-mat/0510662 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.73.184507 · 2005-10-25 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Optical data is encoded with information on the microscopic interaction between charge carriers. For an electron-phonon system, the Eliashberg equations apply and a Kubo formula can be used to get the infrared conductivity. The task of extracting the electron-phonon spectral density $α^2F(ω)$ from data is rather complicated and, thus, simplified but approximate expressions for the conductivity have often been used. We test the accuracy of such simplifications and also discuss the advantages and disadvantages of various numerical methods needed in the inversion process. Normal and superconducting state are considered as well as boson exchange mechanisms which might be applicable to the High-$T_c$ oxides.
Similar papers
Eliashberg Theory in the Weak Coupling Limit
similarity 0.89F. Marsiglio · 2018 · arXiv:1807.04907
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Unbalanced superconductivity induced by the constant electron-phonon coupling on a square lattice
similarity 0.88Kamila A. Szewczyk et al. · 2018 · arXiv:1803.10965
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconductivity of incoherent electrons in Yukawa-SYK model
similarity 0.87Laura Classen & Andrey Chubukov · 2021 · arXiv:2106.12078
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Eliashberg Theory: a short review
similarity 0.87F. Marsiglio · 2019 · arXiv:1911.05065
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Quantum-critical pairing with varying exponents
similarity 0.87Eun-Gook Moon & Andrey V. Chubukov · 2010 · arXiv:1005.0356
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
The superconducting phase of Calcium under the pressure at 200 GPa: the strong-coupling description
similarity 0.87R. Szczęśniak & A. P. Durajski · 2011 · arXiv:1108.4778
Source status unknown — claims are unverified