Optical sum rule in metals with a strong interaction
A. E. Karakozov, E. G. Maksimov
arXiv:cond-mat/0511185 · 2005-11-08
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
The restricted optical sum rule and its dependence on the temperature, a superconducting gap and the cutoff energy have been investigated. As known this sum rule depends on the cutoff energy and the relaxation rate even for a homogeneous electron gas interacting with impurities or phonons. It is shown here that additional dependence of the spectral weight on a superconducting gap is very small in this model and this effect disappears totally when the relaxation rate is equal zero. The model metal with a single band is considered in details. It is well known that for this model there is the dependence of the sum rule on the temperature and the energy gap even in the case when the relaxation is absent. This dependence exists due to the smearing of the electron distribution function and it is expressed in the terms of Sommerfeld expansion. Here it is shown that these effects are considerably smaller than that of related with the relaxation rate if the band width is larger than the average phonon frequency. It is shown also that the experimental data about the temperature dependence of the spectral weight for the high- materials can be successfully explained in the framework approach based on the temperature dependence of the relaxation rate
Similar papers
Temperature Dependence of the Conductivity Sum Rule in the Normal State due to Inelastic Scattering
similarity 0.89L. Benfatto et al. · 2006 · arXiv:cond-mat/0603661
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Optical Sum Rule in Finite Bands
similarity 0.88J. P. Carbotte & E. Schachinger · 2006 · arXiv:cond-mat/0608116
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Quasiparticle formation and optical sum rule violation in cuprate superconductors
similarity 0.88M. R. Norman & C. Pépin
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Sum Rule Anomaly from Suppression of Inelastic Scattering in the Superconducting State
similarity 0.87Frank Marsiglio · 2005 · arXiv:cond-mat/0510649
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Sum rule for the optical scattering rates
similarity 0.87F. Marsiglio et al. · 2001 · arXiv:cond-mat/0110021
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
The in-plane electrodynamics of the superconductivity in Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8+d: energy scales and spectral weight distribution
similarity 0.87A. F. Santander-Syro et al. · 2004 · arXiv:cond-mat/0405264
Source status unknown — claims are unverified