Discrete-lattice model approach to the tunneling between d-wave superconductors: interference of tunnel bonds
A. M. Bobkov
arXiv:cond-mat/0512129 · DOI 10.1134/S0021364006030040 · 2005-12-06 · JETP Letters
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
The Josephson current between d-wave superconductors is investigated in the framework of tight-binding lattice model. The junction is modelled by a small number of connecting bonds. It is obtained that the Josephson current through one bond vanishes when at least one of the superconductors has $(110)$ interface-to-crystal orientation. Interference between the nearest bonds is appeared to be very important. In particular, it is the interference term that leads to the nonzero Josephson current for $(110)$ orientation. Also, interference of two connecting bonds manifests itself in non-monotonic behavior of the critical Josephson current in dependence on the distance between the bonds.
Similar papers
Charge transport in junctions between d-wave superconductors
similarity 0.90Yu. S. Barash et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Full t-matrix approach to quasiparticle interference in non-centrosymmetric superconductors
similarity 0.89Alireza Akbari & Peter Thalmeier · 2013 · arXiv:1309.6595
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Cuprate Twistronics for Quantum Hardware
similarity 0.89Tommaso Confalone et al. · 2025 · arXiv:2511.08249
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Field-free Josephson diode effect in a d-wave superconductor heterostructure
similarity 0.89Hamed Vakili et al. · 2024 · arXiv:2406.11127
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Multipair DC-Josephson Resonances in a biased all-superconducting Bijunction
similarity 0.89T. Jonckheere et al. · 2013 · arXiv:1301.2344
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Designing Phase Sensitive Probes of Monopole Superconducting Order
similarity 0.89Grayson R. Frazier et al. · 2024 · arXiv:2407.18701
Source status unknown — claims are unverified