Comparison of the Electronic Structures of Two Non-cuprate Layered Transition Metal Oxide Superconductors
E. R. Ylvisaker, K. -W. Lee, W. E. Pickett
arXiv:cond-mat/0512211 · DOI 10.1016/j.physb.2006.03.057 · 2005-12-09 · Physica B-condensed Matter
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Comparison is made of the electronic structure of the little-studied layered transition metal oxide LiNbO$_2$ with that of Na$_x$CoO$_2$, which has attracted tremendous interest since superconductivity was discovered in its hydrate. Although the active transition metal $d$ states are quite different due to different crystal fields and band filling, both systems show a strong change of electronic structure with changes in the distance between the transition metal ion layer and the oxygen layers. The niobate is unusual in having a large second-neighbor hopping amplitude, and a nearest neighbor hopping amplitude that is sensitive to the Nb-O separation. Li$_x$NbO$_2$ also presents the attractive simplicity of a single band triangular lattice system with variable carrier concentration that is superconducting.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| LixNbO2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 5 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| NaxCoO2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 5 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Electronic structure and magnetism in Ru based perovskites
similarity 0.91I. I. Mazin & D. J. Singh · 1997 · arXiv:cond-mat/9702168
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Relationship of Sr2RuO4 to the superconducting layered cuprates
similarity 0.89David J. Singh
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Puzzling superconductivity in strontium ruthenate: then and now
similarity 0.89James F. Annett & Karol I. Wysokiński · 2026 · arXiv:2607.21194
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superstructure and superconductivity in Li1−xNbO2(x≈0.7) single crystals
similarity 0.89E. G. Moshopoulou et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Quasiparticle States near the Surface and the Domain Wall in a p_x\pm i p_y-Wave Superconductor
similarity 0.89Masashige Matsumoto & Manfred Sigrist · 1999 · arXiv:cond-mat/9902265
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Low temperature electronic properties of Sr_2RuO_4 II: Superconductivity
similarity 0.88Ralph Werner · 2002 · arXiv:cond-mat/0208307
Source status unknown — claims are unverified