Dephasing of a superconducting qubit induced by photon noise
P. Bertet, I. Chiorescu, G. Burkard, K. Semba, C. J. P. M. Harmans, D. P. DiVincenzo, J. E. Mooij
arXiv:cond-mat/0512428 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.257002 · 2005-12-18 · Physical review letters
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We have studied the dephasing of a superconducting flux-qubit coupled to a DC-SQUID based oscillator. By varying the bias conditions of both circuits we were able to tune their effective coupling strength. This allowed us to measure the effect of such a controllable and well-characterized environment on the qubit coherence. We can quantitatively account for our data with a simple model in which thermal fluctuations of the photon number in the oscillator are the limiting factor. In particular, we observe a strong reduction of the dephasing rate whenever the coupling is tuned to zero. At the optimal point we find a large spin-echo decay time of $4 μs$.
Similar papers
Dephasing of a Superconducting Qubit Induced by Photon Noise
similarity 0.93P. Bertet et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconducting qubits II: Decoherence
similarity 0.92Wilhelm, F. K. et al. · 2006 · arXiv:cond-mat/0603637
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Coherent dynamics and decoherence in a superconducting weak link
similarity 0.91J. T. Peltonen et al. · 2016 · arXiv:1601.07899
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Energy decay and frequency shift of a superconducting qubit from non-equilibrium quasiparticles
similarity 0.90M. Lenander et al. · 2011 · arXiv:1101.0862
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Decoherence of flux qubits due to 1/f flux noise
similarity 0.90F. Yoshihara et al. · 2006 · arXiv:cond-mat/0606481
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Probing Noise in Flux Qubits via Macroscopic Resonant Tunneling
similarity 0.90R. Harris et al. · 2007 · arXiv:0712.0838
Source status unknown — claims are unverified