Electrostatic- and Parallel Magnetic Field- Tuned Two Dimensional Superconductor-Insulator Transitions
Kevin A. Parendo, K. H. Sarwa B. Tan, A. M. Goldman
arXiv:cond-mat/0512704 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.73.174527 · 2005-12-29 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
The 2D superconductor-insulator transition in disordered ultrathin amorphous bismuth films has been tuned both by electrostatic electron doping using the electric field effect and by the application of parallel magnetic fields. Electrostatic doping was carried out in both zero and nonzero magnetic fields, and magnetic tuning was conducted at multiple strengths of electrostatically induced superconductivity. The transitions were analyzed using finite size scaling with critical exponent products nu*z = 0.65-0.7. The parallel critical magnetic field increased with electron transfer as (dn_c-dn)^0.33, where dn is the electron transfer and dn_c is its critical value, and the critical resistance decreased linearly with dn. However at lower temperatures, in the insulating regime, the resistance became larger than expected from extrapolation of its temperature dependence at higher temperatures, and scaling failed. These observations imply that although the electrostatic- and parallel magnetic field- tuned superconductor-insulator transitions would appear to belong to the same universality class and to be delineated by a robust phase boundary that can be crossed either by tuning electron density or magnetic field, in the case of the field-tuned transition at the lowest temperatures, some different type of physical behavior turns on in the insulating regime.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bi Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 0.13 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Bi Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 0.06 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Nonlinear Sigma Model for Disordered Media: Replica Trick for Non-Perturbative Results and Interactions
similarity 0.92Igor V. Lerner · 2002 · arXiv:cond-mat/0205555
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
The Superconductor-Insulator Transition in 2D
similarity 0.91N. Markovic et al. · 1999 · arXiv:cond-mat/9904168
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Electrostatic and parallel-magnetic-field tuned two-dimensional superconductor-insulator transitions
similarity 0.90Kevin A. Parendo et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Thickness-Magnetic Field Phase Diagram at the Superconductor-Insulator Transition in 2D
similarity 0.90N. Markovic et al. · 1998 · arXiv:cond-mat/9808176
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Scaling behavior of the magnetic-field-tuned superconductor-insulator transition in two-dimensional Josephson-junction arrays
similarity 0.90C. D. Chen et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
The Field-Tuned Superconductor-Insulator Transition with and without Current Bias
similarity 0.90E. Bielejec & Wenhao Wu · 2001 · arXiv:cond-mat/0108232
Source status unknown — claims are unverified