Fidelity and quantum chaos in the mesoscopic device for the Josephson flux qubit
Ezequiel N. Pozzo, Daniel Dominguez
arXiv:cond-mat/0601698 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.77.024518 · 2006-01-31 · Physical review letters
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We show that the three-junction SQUID device designed for the Josephson flux qubit can be used to study the dynamics of quantum chaos when operated at high energies. We determine the parameter region where the system is classically chaotic. We calculate numerically the fidelity or Loschmidt echo (LE) in the quantum dynamics under perturbations in the magnetic field and in the critical currents, and study different regimes of the LE. We discuss how the LE could be observed experimentally considering both the preparation of the initial state and the measurement procedure.
Similar papers
Fidelity and Quantum Chaos in the Mesoscopic Device for the Josephson Flux Qubit
similarity 0.93Ezequiel N. Pozzo & Daniel Domínguez
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Quantum chaos in the mesoscopic device for the Josephson flux qubit
similarity 0.89Ezequiel N. Pozzo et al. · 2006 · arXiv:cond-mat/0612288
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Dynamics of Fluxon Lattice in Two Coupled Josephson Junctions
similarity 0.88A. F. Volkov & V. A. Glen · 1998 · arXiv:cond-mat/9807156
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Dynamic behaviour of Josephson-junction qubits: crossover between Rabi oscillations and Landau-Zener transitions
similarity 0.88S. N. Shevchenko et al. · 2004 · arXiv:cond-mat/0412588
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Quantum-critical dynamics of a Josephson junction at the topological transition
similarity 0.87Vladislav D. Kurilovich et al. · 2021 · arXiv:2102.05686
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
BCS models of Josephson qubits I. Energy spectra
similarity 0.87Alicki, R. & Miklaszewski, W. · 2010 · arXiv:1012.0140
Source status unknown — claims are unverified