First-principles calculations of spin-orbit effects and NMR in Sr2RuO4
E. Pavarini, I. I. Mazin
arXiv:cond-mat/0603210 · 2006-03-08
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We present a first principles study of NMR and spin orbit effects in the unconventional superconductor Sr2RuO4. We have calculated the uniform magnetic susceptibility, which agrees rather well with the experiment in amplitude, but, as in an earlier model result we found the calculated hard axis to be z, opposite to the experiment. We have also calculated the Knight shifts and the NMR relaxation rates for all atoms, and again found an overall good agreement, but important deviations from the experiment in same particular characteristic, such as the Knight shift anisotropy. Our results suggest that correlations in Sr2RuO4 lead to underestimations of the orbital effects in density-functional based calculations. We also argue that the accepted ``experimental'' value for the relative contribution of orbital polarization in susceptibility, 10-15%, is also an underestimation. We discuss the puzzling invariance of the the O and Ru Knight shift across the superconducting transition for all directions of the applied field. We show that this fact cannot be explained by accidental cancellations or spin-flip scattering, as it happens in some elemental superconductors. We also point out that large contribution of the dipole and orbital hyperfine field into the Knight shifts in Sr2RuO4, combined with the possibility of an orbital-dependent superconductivity, calls for a revision of the standard theory of the Knight shift in the superconducting state.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sr2RuO4 Archive — disputed claim Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Spin waves in a two dimensional p-wave superconductor: SrRuO
similarity 0.94Hae-Young Kee et al. · 1999 · arXiv:cond-mat/9907276
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Towards a Microscopic Theory of the Knight Shift in an Anisotropic, Multiband Type-II Superconductor
similarity 0.92Richard A. Klemm · 2018 · arXiv:1803.08997
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Effect of strain inhomogeneity on a chiral p-wave superconductor
similarity 0.92Yue Yu & S. Raghu · 2019 · arXiv:1901.03668
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Puzzling superconductivity in strontium ruthenate: then and now
similarity 0.91James F. Annett & Karol I. Wysokiński · 2026 · arXiv:2607.21194
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Chiral P-Wave Order in Sr_2RuO_4
similarity 0.91Kallin, Catherine · 2012 · arXiv:1210.2992
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Determination of the Superconducting Gap Structure in All Bands of the Spin-Triplet Superconductor Sr2RuO4
similarity 0.91Kazuhiko Deguchi et al. · 2004 · arXiv:cond-mat/0404070
Source status unknown — claims are unverified