Influence of Al doping on the critical fields and gap values in magnesium diboride single crystals
T. Klein, L. Lyard, J. Marcus, C. Marcenat, P. Szabo, Z. Hol'anov'a, P. Samuely, B. W. Kang, H-J. Kim, H-S. Lee, H-K. Lee, S-I. Lee
arXiv:cond-mat/0604316 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.73.224528 · 2006-04-12 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
The lower ($H_{c1}$) and upper ($H_{c2}$) critical fields of Mg$_{1-x}$Al$_{x}$B$_2$ single crystals (for $x = 0$, 0.1 and $\gtrsim 0.2$) have been deduced from specific heat and local magnetization measurements, respectively. We show that $H_{c1}$ and $H_{c2}$ are both decreasing with increasing doping content. The corresponding anisotropy parameter $Γ_{H_{c2}}(0) = H^{ab}_{c2}(0)/H^c_{c2}(0)$ value also decreases from $\sim 5$ in pure MgB$_2$ samples down to $\sim 1.5$ for $x \gtrsim 0.2$ whereas $Γ_{H_{c1}}(0)=H^c_{c1}(0)/H^{ab}_{c1}(0)$ remains on the order of 1 in all samples. The small and large gap values have been obtained by fitting the temperature dependence of the zero field electronic contribution to the specific heat to the two gap model for the three Al concentrations. Very similar values have also been obtained by point contact spectroscopy measurements. The evolution of those gaps with Al concentration suggests that both band filling and interband scattering effects are present.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mg1-xAlxB2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 12.5 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Mg1-xAlxB2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 18 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| MgB2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 37 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Mg0.9Al0.1B2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 31 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Mg0.8Al0.2B2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 21 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Influence of Al doping on the critical fields and gap values in magnesium diboride single crystals
similarity 0.92T. Klein et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Electron-phonon coupling and two-band superconductivity of Al- and C-doped MgB2
similarity 0.91O. De la Peña-Seaman et al. · 2010 · arXiv:1012.3330
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Band filling and interband scattering effects in MgB: C vs Al doping
similarity 0.90Jens Kortus et al. · 2004 · arXiv:cond-mat/0411667
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
A magnetization and B NMR study of MgAlB superconductors
similarity 0.90M. Pissas et al. · 2001 · arXiv:cond-mat/0111351
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Comment on: "Band Filling and Interband Scattering Effects in MgB2: Carbon versus Aluminium Doping"
similarity 0.90P. Samuely et al. · 2005 · arXiv:cond-mat/0503153
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
A Point-Contact Study of the Superconducting Gaps in Al-Substituted and C-Substituted MgB_2 Single Crystals
similarity 0.90R. S. Gonnelli et al. · 2004 · arXiv:cond-mat/0407267
Source status unknown — claims are unverified