Non-universal suppression of the excitation gap in chaotic Andreev billiards: Superconducting terminals as sensitive probes for scarred states
Andor Kormanyos, Henning Schomerus
arXiv:cond-mat/0605205 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.124102 · 2006-05-08 · Physical review letters
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
When a quantum-chaotic normal conductor is coupled to a superconductor, random-matrix theory predicts that a gap opens up in the excitation spectrum which is of universal size $E_g^{\rm RMT}\approx 0.3 \hbar/t_D$, where $t_D$ is the mean scattering time between Andreev reflections. We show that a scarred state of long lifetime $t_S\gg t_D$ suppresses the excitation gap over a window $ΔE\approx 2 E_g^{\rm RMT}$ which can be much larger than the narrow resonance width $Γ_S=\hbar/t_S$ of the scar in the normal system. The minimal value of the excitation gap within this window is given by $Γ_S/2\ll E_g^{\rm RMT}$. Hence the scarred state can be detected over a much larger energy range than it is the case when the superconducting terminal is replaced by a normal one.
Similar papers
Excitation spectra for Andreev billiards of Box and Disk geometries
similarity 0.89J. Cserti et al. · 2001 · arXiv:cond-mat/0105472
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconducting Terminals as Sensitive Probes for Scarred States
similarity 0.89Andor Kormányos & Henning Schomerus
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Interplay between evanescent scattering modes and finite dispersion in superconducting junctions
similarity 0.88Daniel Kruti & Roman-Pascal Riwar · 2024 · arXiv:2408.07035
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Ehrenfest-time-dependent excitation gap in a chaotic Andreev billiard
similarity 0.87I. Adagideli & C. W. J. Beenakker · 2002 · arXiv:cond-mat/0202206
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Dynamical parity selection in superconducting weak links
similarity 0.87Nico Ackermann et al. · 2022 · arXiv:2207.05782
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Checkerboard density of states in strong-coupling superconductors
similarity 0.87A. S. Alexandrov · 2004 · arXiv:cond-mat/0407401
Source status unknown — claims are unverified