Effect of field dependent core size on reversible magnetization of high-$κ$ superconductors

V. G. Kogan; R. Prozorov; S. L. Bud'ko; P. C. Canfield; J. R. Thompson; J. Karpinski; N. D. Zhigadlo; P. Miranović

doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.74.184521

← Back to search

Effect of field dependent core size on reversible magnetization of high-$κ$ superconductors

V. G. Kogan, R. Prozorov, S. L. Bud'ko, P. C. Canfield, J. R. Thompson, J. Karpinski, N. D. Zhigadlo, P. Miranović

arXiv:cond-mat/0606562 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.74.184521 · 2006-06-21 · Physical Review B

T2theoretical14 citations

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

The field dependence of the vortex core size $ξ(B)$ is incorporated in the London model, in order to describe reversible magnetization $M(B,T)$ for a number of materials with large Ginzburg-Landau parameter $κ$. The dependence $ξ(B)$ is directly related to deviations in $M(\ln B)$ from linear behavior prescribed by the standard London model. A simple method to extract $ξ(B)$ from the magnetization data is proposed. For most materials examined, $ξ(B)$ so obtained decreases with increasing field and is in qualitative agreement both with behavior extracted from $μ$SR and small angle neutron scattering data and with that predicted theoretically.

Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval

Formula	Reported Tc (K)	Pressure (GPa)	Type
CeCoIn5 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.	—	Pressure not reported	unknown
V3Si Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.	—	Pressure not reported	unknown
YNi2B2C Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.	—	Pressure not reported	unknown
YNi2B2C Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.	—	Pressure not reported	unknown
Y(Ni0.8Pt0.2)2B2C Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.	—	Pressure not reported	unknown
Bi2Sr2CuO6 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.	—	Pressure not reported	unknown
MgB2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.	—	Pressure not reported	unknown
MgB2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.	—	Pressure not reported	unknown
LuNi2B2C Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.	—	Pressure not reported	unknown
Lu(Ni0.97Co0.03)2B2C Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.	—	Pressure not reported	unknown
Lu(Ni0.94Co0.06)2B2C Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.	—	Pressure not reported	unknown