Analysis of measurement errors for a superconducting phase qubit
Qin Zhang, Abraham G. Kofman, John M. Martinis, Alexander N. Korotkov
arXiv:cond-mat/0607385 · 2006-07-14
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We analyze several mechanisms leading to errors in a course of measurement of a superconducting flux-biased phase qubit. Insufficiently long measurement pulse may lead to nonadiabatic transitions between qubit states $|1>$ and $|0>$, before tunneling through a reduced barrier is supposed to distinguish the qubit states. Finite (though large) ratio of tunneling rates for these states leads to incomplete discrimination between $|1>$ and $|0>$. Insufficiently fast energy relaxation after the tunneling of state $|1>$ may cause the repopulation of the quantum well in which only the state $|0>$ is supposed to remain. We analyze these types of measurement errors using analytical approaches as well as numerical solution of the time-dependent Schrödinger equation.
Similar papers
Analysis of measurement errors for a superconducting phase qubit
similarity 0.92Qin Zhang et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Quantum behavior of a dc SQUID phase qubit
similarity 0.88Kaushik Mitra et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Errors due to finite rise and fall times of pulses in superconducting charge qubits
similarity 0.88Sangchul Oh
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Probing the quantum coherence of a nanomechanical resonator using a superconducting qubit II: Implementation
similarity 0.88M. P. Blencowe & A. D. Armour · 2008 · arXiv:0804.2179
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Single-shot readout of a superconducting flux qubit with a flux-driven Josephson parametric amplifier
similarity 0.87Z. R. Lin et al. · 2013 · arXiv:1309.6706
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Geometrical dependence of low frequency noise in superconducting flux qubits
similarity 0.87T. Lanting et al. · 2008 · arXiv:0812.0378
Source status unknown — claims are unverified