Comment on "Probing vortex unbinding via dipole fluctuations"
S. E. Korshunov
arXiv:cond-mat/0607632 · 2006-07-25
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We demonstrate that the method suggested by Fertig and Straley [Phys. Rev. B 66, 201402 (2002)] for the identification of different phases in two-dimensional XY models does not allow to make any unambiguous conclusions and make a tentative proposal of another approach to this problem.
Similar papers
Vortex structure and intervortex interaction in superconducting structures with intrinsic diode effect
similarity 0.83A. V. Putilov et al. · 2025 · arXiv:2506.22209
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Individual Vortex Manipulation and Stick-Slip Motion in Periodic Pinning Arrays
similarity 0.83X. Ma et al. · 2017 · arXiv:1712.04566
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Size driven phase transitions in pinned vortex systems
similarity 0.83P. S. Cornaglia & M. F. Laguna · 2002 · arXiv:cond-mat/0209565
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Quench dynamics of the three-dimensional U(1) complex field theory: geometric and scaling characterisation of the vortex tangle
similarity 0.83Michikazu Kobayashi & Leticia F. Cugliandolo · 2016 · arXiv:1609.02431
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Topological phase-fluctuations, amplitude fluctuations, and criticality in extreme type-II superconductors
similarity 0.83A. K. Nguyen & A. Sudbø · 1999 · arXiv:cond-mat/9907385
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Stable fractional flux vortices and unconventional magnetic state in two-component superconductors
similarity 0.82M. A. Silaev · 2010 · arXiv:1008.1194
Source status unknown — claims are unverified